Valtionavustus
TFK, Ukraine programme 2025
- Tila
-
Arvioitavana
- Hakuaika
-
27.1.2025 – 28.4.2025 klo 16:15
- Hakulomake
-
Haku päättynyt
- Määräraha
-
500 000 €
- Lisätietoa antavat
-
Päätökseen liittyvät tiedustelut ja kysymykset voi osoittaa myös sähköpostiin TFK-programme@oph.fi
Valintaperusteet
NEEDS ANALYSIS AND ROLES OF PARTNERS:
• The project responds to a relevant and justifiable need.
• The planned activities are relevant to the participating higher education institutions.
• The responsibilities, roles and tasks of the higher education institutions involved with the project are clearly described.
• The participating higher education institutions have an institutional commitment to and interest in the activities.
QUALITY OF COOPERATION, ACTIVITY DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION:
• The activities are realistically planned and clearly described. The project also describes clearly how the planned activities will be covered by the applied funding.
• Quality aspects are taken into account in the activities and the progress/successes, etc. of the project are monitored.
• The risk analysis addresses the risks associated with project activities, such as partner withdrawals, recruitment challenges, the misuse of resources and the potential harmful environmental impacts of the project. Additionally, it evaluates the realization of academic values, freedom of speech, and non-discrimination, as well as risks related to dual-use technologies.
• The following are also taken into account in projects involving student mobility:
• The support services for preparation, implementation and follow-up of the applied mobility activities are in place.
• The processes for recognising the participating students’ learning outcomes exist (such as ECTS and other mechanisms).
RESULTS AND IMPACT:
• The application describes the impacts of the project for the participants and organisations.
• The anticipated results or outputs of the project are described concretely and realistically.
• The project does not remain separate and the results/outputs are integrated to the normal operations of the higher education institutions.
• The project responds to a relevant and justifiable need.
• The planned activities are relevant to the participating higher education institutions.
• The responsibilities, roles and tasks of the higher education institutions involved with the project are clearly described.
• The participating higher education institutions have an institutional commitment to and interest in the activities.
QUALITY OF COOPERATION, ACTIVITY DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION:
• The activities are realistically planned and clearly described. The project also describes clearly how the planned activities will be covered by the applied funding.
• Quality aspects are taken into account in the activities and the progress/successes, etc. of the project are monitored.
• The risk analysis addresses the risks associated with project activities, such as partner withdrawals, recruitment challenges, the misuse of resources and the potential harmful environmental impacts of the project. Additionally, it evaluates the realization of academic values, freedom of speech, and non-discrimination, as well as risks related to dual-use technologies.
• The following are also taken into account in projects involving student mobility:
• The support services for preparation, implementation and follow-up of the applied mobility activities are in place.
• The processes for recognising the participating students’ learning outcomes exist (such as ECTS and other mechanisms).
RESULTS AND IMPACT:
• The application describes the impacts of the project for the participants and organisations.
• The anticipated results or outputs of the project are described concretely and realistically.
• The project does not remain separate and the results/outputs are integrated to the normal operations of the higher education institutions.